@article {9519,
	title = {Solicited Dialogue on "A Never Ending Story\&"},
	journal = {Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal canadien d{\textquoteright}arch{\'e}ologie},
	volume = {18},
	year = {1994},
	pages = {099-101},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
@Conference Paper {10302,
	title = {Unexpected Contributions From An Unusual Man},
	year = {2001},
	address = {Banff},
	abstract = {For close to 30 years, the Province of Alberta has enjoyed the benefits of some of the most comprehensive heritage legislation in North America. As a result of its existence, a cultural resource management regime has been developed which sees the routine conduct of archaeological investigations in conjunction with development projects throughout the Province. These projects range in scale from multi-million dollar investigations spanning five years or more, involving a host of professionals and large territories such as those encompassed by the oil sands mining programmes in northern Alberta, down to brief inspections of individual residential properties. The cumulative effect of these investigations has been to open vast chapters of Alberta{\textquoteright}s prehistory. The existence of this system and the results it generates can be traced to the pioneering leadership of Richard G. Forbis.},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
@Conference Paper {10301,
	title = {The Archaeological Survey of Alberta},
	year = {1976},
	address = {Winnipeg},
	abstract = {With the passage of the Alberta Heritage Act 1973, the province of Alberta changed from a province with little or no legislation relevant to archaeological resource management to one with a modern integrated legislative package concerned not only with archaeological protection but also with the promotion of archaeological investigation and documentation. This legislation has, in the intervening two years, been supplemented by amendments to the original Act which have served to strengthen its authority, and by the establishment of a provincial agency designed specifically to implement the provisions of the Act as they pertain to archaeology. At this time it is possible to review the activities of the Survey in its first two years, and to predict future activities and developments.},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
@Conference Paper {10299,
	title = {The Prehistory and Ethnohistory of the Canadian Plains as Reflected by Ceramics},
	year = {1973},
	address = {Burnaby},
	abstract = {Although the ceramics from the Canadian plains are sparse in quantity, their formal and stylistic variations, at least in southern Alberta and the adjacent portions of Saskatchewan, are sufficiently distinctive to determine that the pottery can be divided into two major ceramic traditions, the Saskatchewan Basin complex and the Cluny complex. An Early variant of the Saskatchewan Basin complex is affiliated with Avonlea phase occupations dating approximately between A.D. 600 and A.D. 900, and a Late variant with subsequent Old Women{\textquoteright}s phase components; both of these phases were originally defined on the basis of non-ceramic{\textendash}mainly lithic{\textendash}data. The Cluny complex, in contrast, associates with a new phase, the One Gun phase, which appears to represent an intrusion of Middle Missouri peoples into the area sometime after A.D. 1725. It would appear quite definite that the Cluny complex/One Gun phase materials were manufactured by a splinter group of the Hidatsa, possibly the Crow, while at least the Late variant of the Saskatchewan Basin complex/Old Women{\textquoteright}s phase assemblages are the remains of prehistoric and protohistoric Blackfoot groups.},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
@Symposium Papers {11004,
	title = {The resource question and rescue archaeology},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1976},
	pages = {109-121},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
@article {9520,
	title = {Fresno Reservoir Pottery: Saskatchewan Basin Ceramics in Northern Montana},
	journal = {Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal canadien d{\textquoteright}arch{\'e}ologie},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {001-025},
	abstract = {<p>A series of ceramics from five sites in the Fresno Reservoir area of north central Montana is described. These ceramics fall into two categories, one resembling Middle Missouri wares, and the other resembling pottery of the Saskatchewan Basin Complex. The presence of the latter is taken to indicate cultural relationships with southern Alberta. and suggests an occupation of the Fresno Reservoir area by Blackfeet.</p>},
	author = {James D. Keyser with a comment by W.J. Byrne}
}
@Conference Paper {10303,
	title = {Historical Issues and Evolution in CRM: A View from Alberta},
	year = {2001},
	address = {Banff},
	abstract = {In any given jurisdiction, the beginnings of Cultural Resource Management are generally equated with the passage of appropriately named legislation or the introduction of specifically focussed programs. Alberta is no exception, and the initiation has generally been equated with the passage of the Alberta Historical Resources Act in 1972. In reality, CRM has been an important factor in the heritage movement for far longer than that, and the issues and principles of significance to the discipline have been evolving for well over 100 years.},
	author = {William J. Byrne}
}
