
1991 Field Report
(Part
7)
by
Jean-Luc Pilon
NOGAP Archaeologist
Canadian Museum of Civilization
Discussion
The continued search for archaeological sites in the southwest
Anderson Plain this summer provided additional site information
from Vidiitshuu and especially Lure Lake where only two sites had
been previously reported. However, perhaps the most interesting
aspect of these surveys was the documentation of trails. There is
every reason to believe that the trails which we identified have
been in use for centuries. The discovery of late prehistoric
semi-subterreanean features near each end of the Lure-Vidiitshuu
trail--from 91JLP-14 to 91JLP-21--strongly supports such a
suggestion. Trails systems, by their very nature as corridors of
movement between resource harvesting areas have the potential of
shedding important light on land use patterns. They can only be
discovered through very intense ground surveys which ideally should
be combined with information from elders who actually used these
overland routes.
It is hoped that a study specifically designed to acquire such
information will take place in 1992. In this way, a much more
robust model of at least late prehistoric and historic site
distributions will be possible. Certainly, the absence of such
systematically obtained data casts a significant shadow over our
archaeological results.
The archaeological reconnaissance along the lower reaches of
the Mackenzie River was highly satisfying in that sites were found
in a wide range of localities. These discoveries suggest that it
is possible to document the prehistoric use of the resources of the
Mackenzie River and that all has not been obliterated. There can
be no argument that the very dynamic nature of that river has
destroyed a very large proportion of the evidence of its
prehistoric use. However, in particular situations, such evidence
has been preserved; at the tops of strategic draws leading up to
the plateau, on high terraces located at tributary mouths, and even
on low terraces where the river configuration actually permits
overbank deposition rather than scouring to take place during
seasonal episodes of high waters.
These observations should be verified in a systematic fashion
by conducting an intensive survey along a well-defined stretch of
the lower Mackenzie River which encompasses a broad diversity of
potential site locations, such as the mouth of a major tributary,
a number of draws leading to the plateau, and low terraces located
near eddies and protected by river configuration from the
destructive effects of ice rafting. Hopefully, such a survey will
be undertaken during the 1992 field season.
The excavations at the Edge Test Unit of MlTk-2 provided a
good illustration of the repeated use of a favoured locality over
the course of centuries. Unfortunately, datable materials were not
recovered, nor were additional microblade-related artifacts found.
The East Point area of MlTk-2 surprised us with the presence
of an ASTt component and has expanded the distribution of this
cultural entity in the region.
The discovery of not one, but two adzes in close proximity to
the semi-subterranean structure tested in 1987 posed more problems
that it resolved. Although initially quite pleased to have finally
found such artifacts, especially in light of the number of adze-cut
stumps which occur around thesestructures, the potential hazard of
associating these artifacts with the late prehistoric dwelling are
clear. Beside the large adze we recovered boulders apparently
thermally fractured to produce blanks, and flakes of the same type
of coarse-grained raw material as the adze. In addition, two
microblade fragments and a possible microblade core rejuvination
tablet lay in the same humus layer. Near the second, smaller
specimen, we found what appears to be a microblade core face which
may have been burinated.
Flakes of coarse-grained raw
materials were found associated with micro/macroblade-related
technology at NbTj-3 (Hyndman Lake) and in the 1987 investigations
of the Edge Test Unit of MlTk-2. Coincidentally, lanceolate points
were also found at both of these sites. It is thus not impossible
that the adzes recovered this summer relate to an occupation which
pre-dates the building and use of the semi-subterranean dwelling.
Lastly, the excavations of the collapsed conical structure at
MlTk-16 illustrate the very frustrating problems posed by subarctic
soils. Although the very small area excavated had obviously been
used more than once, the separation of the two components is only
based on circumstantial grounds--one does not place a fireplace
beside a wall in a skin or bark covered tent.
In the absence of the remains of the poles, there is scant
little to suggest the kind of structure which stood on the site.
Indeed, we cannot even be certain that the large circular hearth
with the associated fresh bone is even associated with the conical
tent structure. Yet again, circumstantial lines of reasoning
suggest this might be so. This excavation might thus be taken as
a potential model for understanding lithic scatters found about
small hearth features elsewhere.